From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:55:37 +0200 Message-ID: <838s83ra3q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> <4FF55FBF-573D-4A70-B3FC-682CA25B7ECB@gnu.org> <83lfc53whk.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203180142.seu6o3i6u7jhkyrh@Ergus> <83eehx3to5.fsf@gnu.org> <20210203221628.xgvvxjvh56gyswba@Ergus> <20210204070033.pm4ido4hq7a6twif@Ergus> <83sg6brhyg.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39275"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 04 19:50:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7ji9-000A7H-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:50:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7ji8-0002Dg-NH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 13:50:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7iqy-0004tk-4h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7iqx-0004c7-F2; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:55:39 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1058 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7iqt-0008Vt-9R; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:55:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87a6sjpyqs.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:19 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263894 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:46:19 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > C-x g c = clone-buffer > > C-x g d = diff-buffers > > C-x g f = fit-frame-to-buffer > > C-x g h = hexl-mode > > C-x g i = insert-buffer > > C-x g l = font-lock-mode > > C-x g n = rename-buffer > > C-x g r = revert-buffer > > C-x g R = revert-buffer-with-fine-grain > > C-x g t = toggle-truncate-lines > > Of the alternative key bindings proposed, I like this the best. Then maybe this is what we should do.