From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: extraclean and admin/grammars [was Re: Git master head build failure?] Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:58:47 +0300 Message-ID: <838s60g548.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875z16en2o.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtuih3en.fsf@gnu.org> <835z16gnkj.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2e2f22w.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgyikmui.fsf@gnus.org> <87v996kmfd.fsf@gnus.org> <83czvdfcrg.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtugls68.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6718"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, theophilusx@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 16:00:10 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lSKLJ-0001fN-TH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 16:00:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59600 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSKLI-0001rI-Vg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 10:00:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSKKR-00010q-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:59:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:60450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lSKKQ-00066R-Eu; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:59:14 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4128 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lSKKN-00078v-Kj; Fri, 02 Apr 2021 09:59:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mtugls68.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:41:51 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267299 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Tim Cross , rgm@gnu.org, > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 15:41:51 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > To the extent that times are at all relevant, you should time on a > > slow machine, and without -j16 (which hints on a modern and a very > > powerful CPU). > > The percentage increase in time should be somewhat similar. It's less > than a 10% increase in "make bootstrap" time (which is something you say > you never do). Percentage is not the only thing that counts; absolute times count as well. Even an extra minute is long enough to annoy, and on older machines it will be more.