From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sqlite3 Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 20:30:49 +0200 Message-ID: <838rw3jmau.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tufmjyai.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl19zwwy.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl18g7r3.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee64ych1.fsf@gnu.org> <83o853pydo.fsf@gnu.org> <875yrbzjc5.fsf@gnus.org> <8335mfpox7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmpjo79j.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilvbo2ab.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7avo1l6.fsf@gnu.org> <87o852cl7z.fsf@gnus.org> <83r19ym6vv.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0fqaxy8.fsf@gnus.org> <83o852m661.fsf@gnu.org> <83lf06m1ll.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8z99p1s.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnjolw37.fsf@gnu.org> <871r1waj1d.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmpglpun.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnjn78fm.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl0zjo4b.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtkj8ey3.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6645"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 29 19:32:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dku-0001VG-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:32:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dks-0001vB-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:32:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2diq-0001CO-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:30:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=47534 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2diq-0007vb-4p; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:30:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=MrPnXhW5D2YoUdJGw6Q+6NsK1pebZsQD0iNGvzF5p7I=; b=Th1fJ42czR6A RL5/Dz9AZFyBIMUjxZRiXaiwfWSkF2wRRgwP2P29jxsEQtoSwYfkr3NOyXoN9iBgHxQbqXoHiBtP6 GI1/RhXNl0qqQ71mPCftQsicLZkJvdJ7RceqtJ8NkptM+Wadg3cxuXI027oEVcyk03QITuf6omkwH gMVdLERTekChEQetFXJ3TPTGYmDUh0bpdQ6RqyZ7laaGHXsuGxqNwgVtIzSSFL2xwP2nOIQ2ko1aq G45xENEZsw1IwtZZvsjw6Ee3fArAqLxf78RKAQY4KZFB38xXM3n9OIH9nto3D/Ei9mvrg8FDUHGm+ VCtPXj2U+6uXe9ZAQ3cc8A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3313 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2dip-0004ac-NY; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:30:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtkj8ey3.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:05:08 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:283585 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 19:05:08 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The "simple" test still fails sometimes. I even enlarged the > > sleep-for to 10 sec, and it still fails. > > Huh. Then it sounds like our analysis of the problem is wrong, and it's > not failing on the time-less-p thing? Maybe. Though I'm at a loss what could that be. > Or... can Windows (or our usage > of it) cache the modification times for a long time? Unlikely. The problem is that its hard to compare time stamps the way we print them in file-attributes. But maybe there's way around that, and we should print the two time stamps being compared in human readable format.