From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 15:51:03 +0300 Message-ID: <838rl5qtag.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875ygb401m.fsf@rfc20.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31680"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Matt Armstrong , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 14:59:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1omx3T-00081o-4r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:59:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omwvf-0000lK-Hl; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:51:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omwvb-0000iD-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omwva-0005Ec-Ec; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:51:38 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=XmrZWwgU64K1TDxIYROWz3WtkbLhNv/figGmvIpMRXs=; b=r56nqAE7rPqU a6fA7ol8zALdg13KaJ++rC3cS9vsoRLxH5YEW4Pqz1EUDLT2mOnkb8gsLVUPO9Wsfmxr1mA03k+gj 5T9thLA+L815m5y0bLrJPA6/MnYQplWpVABs03cy+HUo0YGGQQNtUsHAJtNAhuaH0QqS7EO/+1MRD o1jt9nsI0P6B67//GAMi6Udq+IQRPA557cgkdFPdN7ZT0jZc/pXtwNzcyOz2PxvJ1MO3VQUrKhoTC NlyTxLbJodw5AsOP9TxDr94IMuiOkRiV0Wl/Cb8bfxAQjw/izL0PPCbYberukK6aCyqmS8FfnJ7y5 dc4bUML/WjxLlsfQ2Moc5g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1omwvG-00041f-Pa; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:51:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <875ygb401m.fsf@rfc20.org> (message from Matt Armstrong on Sat, 22 Oct 2022 21:49:09 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:298363 Archived-At: > From: Matt Armstrong > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 21:49:09 -0700 > > There are two calls to 'overlays_in' in buffer.c that I couldn't cover > from ELisp: 'disable_line_numbers_overlay_at_eob' and > 'mouse_face_overlay_overlaps'. They're both display related. > > Trying to manually exercise 'disable_line_numbers_overlay_at_eob' I > couldn't find any ELisp that set `display-line-numbers-disable' on an > overlay, and only two that do it in a text property (vc/log-edit.el and > something in helm), so even if there were a bug here I'm not sure anyone > would discover it. AFAIR, company-mode uses that overlay property. Dmitry, am I right?