From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Indentation and gc Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:37:58 +0200 Message-ID: <838rg0u0fd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i.ref@Ergus> <20230310110747.4hytasakomvdyf7i@Ergus> <87a60k657y.fsf@web.de> <838rg4zmg9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttys4dge.fsf@web.de> <83sfebyepp.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttyru4zt.fsf@web.de> <83fsabyb41.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt4jtpqf.fsf@web.de> <83ilf7wi48.fsf@gnu.org> <878rg3wh2f.fsf@localhost> <83cz5fwggd.fsf@gnu.org> <871qlvwg1s.fsf@localhost> <83a60jwf9l.fsf@gnu.org> <871qluuk3y.fsf@localhost> <831qluuj7e.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8j6t3i9.fsf@localhost> <83v8j6t2ib.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg8gbsch.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32950"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 13 16:38:38 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkFy-0008Ma-8l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:38:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkFY-0006YS-Fx; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkFW-0006Xq-DV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkFV-0004gt-14; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:38:09 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WMLKlxT0APMyI+U8HL0vN2lUae2WqSc+beoiY693ovg=; b=TBqJOEoAb/gi mbXxcdTiAdoR2sVSSrweuNYd5BLFDUhLaZ+q7/fMTROBOBQPPYwdMHcNkS2iIDC6L1T5ANrO8Sfho fDY/Q6wb1E7ShTD0eRdBDlduhpgBsMoo0cGlr+TgUqbtrpxUUf2q82bygPKT0kPWeHHmKtxfJP7b1 QHj1LKAvPqDjbpXR4acF24nlqIncbSiycIT/AeTpWxN2EBbXLg3xQ8Vdg29pylplCDUpO6qatUUzY oYfmteHhAst0OXIxA8mjcyggkzC+9WWB/4NiNLReLU7yubbvg5Q7uY7+Uf6273ciyisGXlq7lJITY //O5MF4ISpoU8dLjZPEb7w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pbkFU-00031h-61; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:38:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zg8gbsch.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:09:50 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304399 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: arne_bab@web.de, spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 15:09:50 +0000 > > I think we can ask interested users to install a package like > https://git.sr.ht/~yantar92/emacs-gc-stats/tree/main/item/emacs-gc-stats.el > > Then, they can share the results after running Emacs with the package > for some time. > > See the attached statistics data example. > > WDYT? Looks useful, thanks. > >> >> - memory-limit 6,518,516, stable > >> > > >> > ??? That's 6 GiB. Didn't you say your memory footprint stabilizes at > >> > 1 GiB? > >> > >> memory-limit is a natively compiled function defined in subr.el. > > > > If the Emacs memory usage in system monitor is 1.7 Gib, how come > > memory-limit says it's 6.5 GiB? > > 6.5Gib is virtual memory. 1.7Gib is actually used memory - the value > people usually mean when considering memory footprint. You mean, the process has a 6.5 GiB footprint, out of which only 1.7 GiB are being used, and the rest is free? That'd mean awfully inefficient libc implementation of malloc.