From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-29 9b775ddc057 1/2: ; * etc/EGLOT-NEWS: Fix wording of last change. Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 17:06:15 +0300 Message-ID: <838rdw8enc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <168335548287.8529.4912240840977468283@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <83ttwpfvcr.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6spfose.fsf@gnu.org> <35df1362-fd92-9424-97d0-df3479414677@gutov.dev> <83edntfm6e.fsf@gnu.org> <667d5cc1-4a3c-5cd4-21c0-adff89cea769@gutov.dev> <834jopfdwz.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8h4elki.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6sofs02.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0rsebcf.fsf@gnu.org> <875y94f4eo.fsf@posteo.net> <834joodmaw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7mwgd1x.fsf@posteo.net> <83y1m0c4zq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs88gc5a.fsf@posteo.net> <83sfc7cbnx.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz3b6j6l.fsf@posteo.net> <838rdzc4zf.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz38fz8d.fsf@posteo.net> <87ild04fdt.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13218"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 10 16:06:04 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pwkSB-00038j-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 May 2023 16:06:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwkRO-0006Fr-94; Wed, 10 May 2023 10:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwkRL-0006FO-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2023 10:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwkRK-0005S8-Im; Wed, 10 May 2023 10:05:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=qF1LsbkqHAhmywkG/N3aMbKO8N2N22l4J1s2PZ7ryJI=; b=GkP8cGR2mHEQ RPgB8/OyaKa5Kt8n7WgnX57t1AnUZMUNZCqBhEQ2braznKphQkWm06TWKv5i6eo9qOpz8g8+u3Glf s7hJlFigNTIDXuUb6SOpQd2g1jcug92ntUMjOxBhtw2HorS6nuvHIvcknBRu07k6dyNlR1M1a86N4 /W31YhP8fs8CwVtnGkOh6uDuQhNlXHiEr5IUqv4jXuwc/luRGahvGfMs1UBk241S26HS6OjedwRf6 iwoqNSKzhRw7njOKmmQqwSZnvGtfGUDnom6ypPVjewfFAnrw74c4HRVJFvgtJjwRuX0AQYcq3EiCd EOnt3lGPHuyz+oQ4nFegTA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pwkRI-0007xW-N4; Wed, 10 May 2023 10:05:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ild04fdt.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Wed, 10 May 2023 11:03:58 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:306028 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 11:03:58 +0000 > > Philip Kaludercic writes: > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > >>> From: Philip Kaludercic > >>> Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >>> Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 13:34:26 +0000 > >>> > >>> >> At least nadvice, cl-lib and cl-generic seem to be the odd ones (the > >>> >> built-in versions are higher, and the ELPA packages are supposed to be > >>> >> used as shims or backward compatibility wrappers). That looks like a bug. > >>> > >>> I think you are right, I can extend my previous patch by a version check. > >> > >> Good idea, IMO. > > > > OK, then this is my proposal: > > I noticed a bug, here is a revised version: Thanks, LGTM.