From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delq string element in ido Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: <837hs96hd0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20a0c1020912260413j733cda64r68141ad90928113c@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261830989 16122 80.91.229.12 (26 Dec 2009 12:36:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 13:36:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NOVsa-0004eW-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:36:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32921 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOVsa-0005Q0-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:36:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOVrt-00059G-7N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:35:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NOVro-00057K-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:35:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33006 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NOVro-00057D-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:35:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44403) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NOVrn-0000oX-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 07:35:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KV900I00EQ2V400@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:35:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.236.58]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KV900HZWEZ33BA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:35:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20a0c1020912260413j733cda64r68141ad90928113c@mail.gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118823 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:13:22 +0000 > From: Leo > Cc: Leo , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > If buf holds "str1" and ido-cur-list '("str1" "str2" "str3"), (delq > buf ido-cur-list) does not return '("str2" "str3"). But it does inside > ido-kill-buffer-at-head. That's where I am confused. Probably because the value of buf comes from ido-cur-list, so it's the same Lisp object as one of the strings in ido-cur-list.