* POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?
@ 2010-03-31 23:11 Dan Nicolaescu
2010-04-01 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Nicolaescu @ 2010-03-31 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Does GNU/Hurd support POSIX_SIGNALS?
Can someone that has access to such a machine try adding
#define POSIX_SIGNALS
to src/s/gnu.h
and see if everything works as expected?
Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?
2010-03-31 23:11 POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd? Dan Nicolaescu
@ 2010-04-01 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-30 20:54 ` Dan Nicolaescu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-04-01 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Nicolaescu; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:11:31 -0400
>
> Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
All these signals mean nothing to w32. AFAICS, we could simply define
empty no-ops for the functions Emacs uses under POSIX_SIGNALS, and
then w32 would not need any special conditions in these quarters.
Let me know if you want me to make this happen. (I guess it's only
worthwhile when the Hurd issue gets cleared.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?
2010-04-01 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2010-04-30 20:54 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2010-05-01 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Nicolaescu @ 2010-04-30 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:11:31 -0400
> >
> > Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
>
> All these signals mean nothing to w32. AFAICS, we could simply define
> empty no-ops for the functions Emacs uses under POSIX_SIGNALS, and
> then w32 would not need any special conditions in these quarters.
>
> Let me know if you want me to make this happen. (I guess it's only
> worthwhile when the Hurd issue gets cleared.)
Please do that. If you add a
#define POSIX_SIGNALS
to the w32 file and take care of the consequences, I'll do a pass later
to remove all references to POSIX_SIGNALS, assuming it is always
defined.
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?
2010-04-30 20:54 ` Dan Nicolaescu
@ 2010-05-01 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2010-05-01 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Nicolaescu; +Cc: emacs-devel
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:54:48 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@gnu.org>
> > > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:11:31 -0400
> > >
> > > Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
> >
> > All these signals mean nothing to w32. AFAICS, we could simply define
> > empty no-ops for the functions Emacs uses under POSIX_SIGNALS, and
> > then w32 would not need any special conditions in these quarters.
> >
> > Let me know if you want me to make this happen. (I guess it's only
> > worthwhile when the Hurd issue gets cleared.)
>
> Please do that.
Done with revno 100106.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-01 18:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-31 23:11 POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd? Dan Nicolaescu
2010-04-01 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2010-04-30 20:54 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2010-05-01 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).