From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: splitting ChangeLogs Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:03:21 +0300 Message-ID: <837hb6vk3q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k4f8uls8.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwpwqc2r.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8762qrra5f.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <8739lurj78.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302145546 14177 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2011 03:05:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 03:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 07 05:05:41 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7fXR-0001DQ-8S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 05:05:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40943 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7fXP-00041K-TW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42286 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7fXE-0003zY-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7fXD-0000Wg-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:61330) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7fXC-0000Wc-T0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 23:05:27 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LJ900L00HJF3200@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:05:25 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LJ900KZDHWZVN80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 07 Apr 2011 06:05:25 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <8739lurj78.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138273 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 09:36:27 +0900 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So what am I missing? > > The logs and diffs. > > If before for splitting ChangeLog, bzr log ChangeLog shows N > revisions, after either of the procedures shown, one of ChangeLog and > ChangeLog.11 has 1 revision, and the other has N+1. bzr diff does > nothing useful with the newly added file. With a hypothetical bzr cp, > both would have N+1, and bzr diff would work on both. I think I see the light now. You are saying that with "bzr cp", the DAG will still be (almost) the same, except that "bzr diff" and other commands will simply act _as_if_ the new ChangeLog had the same history as the old one. Right?