From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Slow/poor responsiveness in org files Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:03:53 +0300 Message-ID: <837h66x6zq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87fwkzcg7d.fsf@gnu.org> <87r54j5426.fsf@gmail.com> <87ty9dylqo.fsf@altern.org> <83d3fyxa52.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313996684 5846 80.91.229.12 (22 Aug 2011 07:04:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@altern.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tim Cross Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 09:04:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvOYn-00070y-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 09:04:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvOYm-0003tE-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:04:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvOYj-0003sy-Gk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:04:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvOYi-000369-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:04:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:55634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvOYi-000365-1g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 03:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LQB00B00I49RY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:03:52 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.175.65]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LQB006J9IAF0TTF@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:03:52 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143495 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:42:56 +1000 > From: Tim Cross > Cc: bzg@altern.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > > =A0. How large is the Org file, in bytes? >=20 > -rw-r--r-- 1 tcross tcross 612856 2011-08-22 12:51 urs.org Strange. I have a 3MB Org file, and I see no such terrible problems there. What is the speed of your CPU clock? I have a 6-year old single-core Pentium 4 CPU here which runs at 3GHz. > there are 3 sections which contain over 50 level 2 items and a Task= s > section which has 120 TODO items (106 marked as done). Is cursor motion in those 3 sections slower than in the other ones? > > =A0. Which commands exhibit the slowdown? =A0Are C-f/C-b slow? = =A0How about > > =A0 left and right arrows? =A0C-v/M-v? Up/down arrows? > > >=20 > It appears to affect all commands. Even typing is sluggish (I can g= et > 'in front' of what is being displayed when typing quickly). Is there any difference between C-f and right-arrow? If setting bidi-paragraph-direction to a non-nil value helps, there ought to be = a difference between these two. > I will try and 'clean' my org file so that all sensitive info is > removed. If after that, the problem still exists, I will send it. Thanks.