From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.4 Updated Windows Binaries published Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:48:04 +0200 Message-ID: <837h01c8hn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4F2EAF8E.3010106@alice.it> <83d39tcjdx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328474891 22126 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2012 20:48:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 05 21:48:10 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru90M-00089O-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:48:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44244 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru90M-0005Cr-42 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:48:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49145) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru90J-0005Ci-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru90H-00026g-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45162) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru90H-00026W-D5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 15:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYX00I00TR4RE00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:48:03 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.144.133]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYX00FZ6TS2WDL0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:48:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148207 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 20:10:50 +0100 > Cc: Angelo Graziosi , emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > > That means unnecessary complications for the volunteers who produ= ce > > the binaries, see the recent threads here (about GnuTLS, but not = only > > about it). =C2=A0For starters, we need to provide sources as well= , and that > > might be tricky legal-wise. >=20 > I have not been following this particular thread, but my understand= ing > is that only a link to the relevant sources is needed now - if we c= an > guarantee that this works. (This was my understanding of a message > from RMS quite some time ago. I might have misunderstood it, though= .) You misunderstood.