From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:18:44 +0200 Message-ID: <837gon89zf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <838v96dgyd.fsf@gnu.org> <8338zecu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <83vcc9aa4a.fsf@gnu.org> <83sj7c8fkn.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwxk7wub.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355332756 32134 80.91.229.3 (12 Dec 2012 17:19:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 17:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dmoncayo@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 12 18:19:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tipxo-0000FR-Vi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:19:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51799 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tipxc-0007FP-2P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TipxV-0007EE-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:19:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TipxO-0003NF-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:45709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TipxO-0003Mw-Mb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:18:54 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MEX00H00HF2CU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MEX00G1YHFBMJG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:18:47 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155516 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dmoncayo@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:26:48 -0500 > > >> Could it be that when you compiled the files, you used an `emacs' that > >> was dumped from .elc files, whereas when you bootstrap, you compile the > >> files with an `emacs' that was dumped from .el files? > > Yes, but that can only explain a 25% increase in time. > > Where do you get that 25% from? I reported that here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2012-12/msg00247.html But it now seems my measurements in this area were not entirely accurate, to say the least. Stay tuned.