From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Anyone building Emacs trunk with MinGW w64 (32 bits) Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:33:36 +0200 Message-ID: <837gkv17wv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjxumbjf.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83vc8f1t0x.fsf@gnu.org> <87sj3jcr6t.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86zjxrs4jm.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3ovcn1r.fsf@wanadoo.es> <838v5b18bv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364247215 19272 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2013 21:33:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:33:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: ofv@wanadoo.es Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 25 22:34:01 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKF1i-0006J0-U1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 22:33:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37236 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKF1L-0004AD-2Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:33:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKF1I-0004A3-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:33:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKF1E-0005zv-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:33:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:49948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKF1E-0005zf-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 17:33:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK800E00JQRTH00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:33:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK800EOIJVONY50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:33:24 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <838v5b18bv.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158172 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:24:36 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > > From: =D3scar Fuentes > > Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 20:11:12 +0100 > >=20 > > Unfortunately, it seems that there is no macro that discriminates > > MinGWW64 from MinGW >=20 > Are you sure? What does the command below produce? >=20 > cpp -dM nul.c >=20 > By comparing what you get with what the MinGW version does, we migh= t > be able to come up with a way to distinguish between them. If the above doesn't give any clues, I think __MINGW64_VERSION_MAJOR might fit the bill. But I'd expect to see __MINGW64__ in the output of the above command.