From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <837gcrc10q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83eh70as37.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383338230 24598 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 20:37:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 21:37:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VcLT0-0003X1-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 21:37:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcLSz-0006Y8-MZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:37:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51279) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcLSq-0006XA-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcLSj-00005j-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:32784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VcLSi-00005D-V6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 16:36:57 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MVL00B00QA27300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:36:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MVL00B4IQLD7C20@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:36:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164834 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:24:47 -0700 > From: "T.V. Raman" > > With all due respect, I believe you're wrong here -- that's not > the problem. And it works correctly at the console. When > running under X, the signal once raised, gets raised repeatedly > after every user command, and the backtrace shows that it's > coming from redisplay. It comes from redisplay because redisplay recomputes the menu and tool-bar items. As the tool bar is not displayed in a TTY session, you don't get signals then. The root cause is still that 'signal' is being advised in a way that exposes it to the user.