From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:03:39 +0200 Message-ID: <837g8dvls4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8338j717oe.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjlf6tdx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sir7yue7.fsf@gnu.org> <8761o3dlak.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83bnxuzyl4.fsf@gnu.org> <871tyqes5q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87a9ddg7o8.fsf@engster.org> <87d2i9ee8t.fsf@engster.org> <874n3ke1qn.fsf@engster.org> <87vbvzcjv9.fsf@engster.org> <87iorz18fy.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87a9db15v8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8761nz0xje.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393697039 31388 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2014 18:03:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 19:04:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoGa-0003Ae-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:04:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60488 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoGa-0001zD-Fk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:04:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoGT-0001yL-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:04:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoGO-000206-5k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:03:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:56214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoGI-0001zK-Hl; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1R00N00RE6QZ00@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:04:04 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1R00DO0RISOIA0@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:04:04 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170007 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:34:12 -0500 > Cc: Juanma Barranquero , dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > The point is to give people a strong motivation to implement the > > necessary support with GCC. > > I don't see how avoiding clang support in Emacs provides motivation for > GCC hackers to add this support, that's been lacking for several > years now. > > > Stefan "who'd favor a GNU clang effort, extending clang with new > exciting features distributed under the GPL" It is a mystery to me why you don't favor CEDET instead.