From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r117000: Untabify cl-macs.el Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:10:50 +0300 Message-ID: <837g6jduo5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5354663D.3050107@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1398064290 13118 80.91.229.3 (21 Apr 2014 07:11:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 21 09:11:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Ns-0002Bt-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:11:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Ns-0008DJ-0I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:11:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Ni-00084K-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Nc-0005BV-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:50804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wc8Nb-0005BR-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 03:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N4D00200D9XTM00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:11:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N4D002KHDABA880@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 21 Apr 2014 10:11:00 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <5354663D.3050107@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171517 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 17:28:45 -0700 > From: Daniel Colascione > > On 04/20/2014 05:03 PM, Daniel Colascione wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > revno: 117000 > > revision-id: dancol@dancol.org-20140421000344-9mcpbae1prbh1uql > > parent: dancol@dancol.org-20140420232404-fgxzomu1nqu3gi96 > > committer: Daniel Colascione > > branch nick: trunk > > timestamp: Sun 2014-04-20 17:03:44 -0700 > > message: > > Untabify cl-macs.el > > On second thought, I've uncommited this change. It might make it hard to > move changes between emacs-24 and trunk. Let's wait until emacs-24 > ships, then untabify everything once. Why untabify at all? Using tabs and spaces is the default GNU coding style, so why should we stray from that? (It's an uphill battle you'll lose anyway, because many people, yours truly included, have indent-tabs-mode set non-nil, which will add back tabs in the portions where changes are made. So with time, the tabs creep back again, and it's a maintenance burden to untabify them time and again.)