From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Recording the date at which a change was pushed to Savannah Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:17:46 +0200 Message-ID: <837fy8546t.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9e4mtd1cdi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87r3whkw6w.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87388xw2pn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fvcw6281.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnnk5z9g.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9345vmt.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417673891 5253 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2014 06:18:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 06:18:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 04 07:18:03 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XwPjm-000224-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 07:18:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44623 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwPjm-0004Xj-Ce for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37197) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwPjV-0004XZ-8O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:17:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwPjP-0003lG-W1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:17:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:47863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XwPjK-0003g7-7X; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:17:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NG100L00O3C1M00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:17:33 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NG100KF2O58W990@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 08:17:33 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:178798 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dak@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:10:30 -0500 > > > But in any case, no matter how the mainline became one, it is still > > _the_ mainline, right? > > No, in the above example, the commit that was the head of the remote > branch before the "git push" (and was hence obviously on "the" mainline) > is not in "the" mainline after the "git push". Yes, but that's just means the mainline moved. It will still be shown the same to you and me, right?