From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: make change-history on non-master branches Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <837fix377i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831tbqc4pc.fsf@gnu.org> <9ta8qb5gcc.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83egfn9nmp.fsf@gnu.org> <56771BBC.6070403@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453742525 8697 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2016 17:22:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 25 18:21:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpv-0006E0-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:21:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpu-0006sH-CU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpq-0006rz-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:21:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpl-0005lE-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpl-0005l9-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:21:45 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4794 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aNkpj-0007kF-Pg; Mon, 25 Jan 2016 12:21:44 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:55:54 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198800 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 11:55:54 -0500 > > I see this is being discussed again, but for some reason with no obvious > reference to the previous discussion we had that explained what the > problems were, nor the solution that was apparently being worked on. > > Ref http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-11/msg01461.html > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-12/msg00914.html The solution is not ready yet, and we did conclude that the solution will have to happen on master, not on the branch. So I see no reasons not to invoke that target on the branch. Moreover, it is a must to do so when preparing a pretest, which is what Nicolas does.