From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Permission requested to merge branch comment-cache into master. Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 14:31:55 +0200 Message-ID: <837fh7ho78.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160312002837.GJ2888@acm.fritz.box> <83mvq4gni4.fsf@gnu.org> <20160312100843.GA2572@acm.fritz.box> <83a8m4gd7p.fsf@gnu.org> <20160312115021.GB2572@acm.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457785978 12729 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2016 12:32:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 12:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: johnw@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 12 13:32:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiix-0002A7-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 13:32:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiit-0001Np-Kb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiif-0001MC-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:32:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiif-0001wH-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:32:33 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42049) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiib-0001vT-89; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:32:29 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1550 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aeiia-0001DO-EC; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 07:32:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <20160312115021.GB2572@acm.fritz.box> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:50:21 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201531 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2016 11:50:21 +0000 > Cc: johnw@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > > > > The slow performance of CC mode is an annoying misfeature, IMO, which > > > > we should strive to fix in Emacs 25.1. > > > > I honestly don't think this change is going to speed up CC Mode very > > > much at all. > > > I don't understand: the original complaint for config.h was about an > > unbearably slow response to a simple editing command. Are you saying > > that these changes will not speed up that use case? > > Sorry, yes, in that particular case the change will speed it up > dramatically. Then I think this should go to the release branch. If there's a way to test it better on a branch, fine. Otherwise, let's include it in the next pretest, and let the crowd find any problems it could still have. Thanks.