From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Are there non-mingw32 binaries for Windows? Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 05:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: <837f82g4hn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87shqq9al0.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479353939 26639 195.159.176.226 (17 Nov 2016 03:38:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 03:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 17 04:38:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DXI-0005pc-KZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 04:38:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56462 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DXK-00047W-Hl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:38:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DXE-00047G-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DX9-00006u-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:38:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35378) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DX9-00006m-HZ; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:38:43 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1084 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c7DX8-0001Hj-Q2; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 22:38:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <87shqq9al0.fsf@wanadoo.es> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3s?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?car?= Fuentes on Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:08:59 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:209449 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:08:59 +0100 > > Kevin Layer writes: > > > It seems 24.3 was the last version that had non-mingw32 binaries. I'm > > speaking of this: > > > > https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/emacs-24.3-bin-i386.zip > > I'm 99% sure that it was compiled with MinGW. I'm 100% sure.