From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of emacs-25 branch Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:14:27 +0300 Message-ID: <837f16m8ak.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mvalc483.fsf@gnu.org> <83fugdbfzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvakppt2.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r2zwa759.fsf@gnu.org> <83shjynqmz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1495649692 6605 195.159.176.226 (24 May 2017 18:14:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 18:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 24 20:14:48 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dDao2-0001aE-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 20:14:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56224 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDao7-0003Gv-WC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:14:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDany-0003F6-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:14:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDanu-0005Br-8H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:14:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54965) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dDanu-0005Bn-4f; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:14:38 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2086 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dDans-0003er-OW; Wed, 24 May 2017 14:14:37 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Mon, 22 May 2017 16:03:43 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215177 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk , rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:03:43 -0400 > > >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > OK, thanks. I kinda agree. But meanwhile we had this nasty bug#26952 > > reported against Emacs 25.2, so I'd like first to see if we can have an > > emergency Emacs 25.3 release. > > That sounds good to me. Does this mean you agree that we should indeed back-port the hybrid memory allocator to the emacs-25 branch? There seems to be some controversy about this, so I asked for your opinion in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26952#67.