From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers, final testing Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:24:35 +0300 Message-ID: <837ezkmwfg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y3s9pm2a.fsf@gnu.org> <87vandz7lw.fsf@lylat> <83wp7tpcav.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2y1z45o.fsf@lylat> <83vandp7wz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8pyy7f.fsf@lylat> <83shigpoxq.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv8nkh31.fsf@lylat> <83bmp3pnmb.fsf@gnu.org> <87eftzju5g.fsf@lylat> <837ezqq3gd.fsf@gnu.org> <874luuyuqy.fsf@lylat> <83wp7po86m.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuecc7vg.fsf@lylat> <83y3s2n5pa.fsf@gnu.org> <878tk1rmjx.fsf@lylat> <83a84gn4z9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499419500 11580 195.159.176.226 (7 Jul 2017 09:25:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 09:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: agrambot@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 07 11:24:52 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVL-0002ZU-Fi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:24:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55328 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVQ-0006Oz-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51816) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVL-0006Ou-6w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVI-0005mt-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:24:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVH-0005md-W6; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4120 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dTPVH-00023U-BF; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 05:24:47 -0400 In-reply-to: <83a84gn4z9.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:19:54 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216261 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 09:19:54 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > If one has to choose between these two behaviours, then I believe the > > former is significantly more user-friendly. It is much easier to reason > > about, and it does not change the horizontal cursor position relative to > > buffer contents. > > OK. Since everyone who offered opinions about this agreed with you, I have now made a change for C-n/C-p to behave like you expected. Thanks.