From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split `simple.el'? Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 05:23:06 +0300 Message-ID: <837ephyv79.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5f1e960c-483f-4902-b4c2-b7a4ca3b04f4@default> <83muyj4hzt.fsf@gnu.org> <87h8oqc1cr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83k1tm2ntt.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7ue3gm7.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8olzu08.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh85u25x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1523240468 16918 195.159.176.226 (9 Apr 2018 02:21:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 02:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 09 04:21:03 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MQY-0004I6-VN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 04:21:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49423 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MSe-0007co-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56043) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MSY-0007cG-HP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MSV-00012q-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44549) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MSV-00012m-9j; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1967 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f5MSU-0000EZ-Nn; Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:23:03 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sh85u25x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:51:38 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224449 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2018 22:51:38 +0300 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> ezimage.el > >> iimage.el > >> image-dired.el > >> image.el > >> image-file.el > >> image-mode.el > >> > >> and maybe more image-related packages like doc-view.el. > > > > Do less than a dozen files justify a separate subdirectory? > > Better to have a dozen files in a separate subdirectory than > just 2 files that already exist in the subdirectory “images”. Maybe we should move those 2 into the parent directory, and remove 'images'?