From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing thread-safe Tramp Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 19:08:16 +0300 Message-ID: <837el6t8r3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736wa9c5s.fsf@gmx.de> <87wotkn6do.fsf@gmx.de> <874lgn8x6l.fsf@gmx.de> <87sh44pisz.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7qbitc7.fsf@gmx.de> <878t5tdsfc.fsf@gmx.de> <83wotcpzub.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmaiuwml.fsf@gmx.de> <877el6uwio.fsf@gmx.de> <7c28f9d8-e2bb-4778-ab92-92707f12718f@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533398821 23376 195.159.176.226 (4 Aug 2018 16:07:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 16:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fgunbin@fastmail.fm, michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 04 18:06:57 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1flz4y-0005tX-VX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 18:06:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55567 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flz73-0004DR-Q6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:09:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flz6T-0004DK-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:08:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flz6O-0007xl-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1flz6O-0007xh-QF; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3743 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1flz6O-00086t-97; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 12:08:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <7c28f9d8-e2bb-4778-ab92-92707f12718f@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228162 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 08:42:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: fgunbin@fastmail.fm, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > I don't really think we should call `C-x &' here a "prefix argument", in any case. It follows the example of "C-x RET c", which runs universal-coding-system-argument. So I see nothing wrong with the name: we have precedence. Or is that the "prefix" part that bothers you?