From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: add Tab to ELPA other-frame-window Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:48:40 +0300 Message-ID: <837e5fznhj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736gci5jn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zhikp0ba.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87lfu4jbbu.fsf@Ergus.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87tv8myi8m.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83imp13ihn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wodhn21l.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83ftk51ydt.fsf@gnu.org> <87imp1k79d.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838spx1x74.fsf@gnu.org> <87imp1ef9i.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86d0f9wkfd.fsf_-_@stephe-leake.org> <87sgo4s47x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="146017"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 08 09:50:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iHkG0-000bsO-0K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:50:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51736 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHkFy-0004sh-OW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHkEf-0004Q7-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHkEe-0007PL-8v; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3093 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iHkEd-0000X3-4n; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 03:48:43 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sgo4s47x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:14:27 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:240737 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 23:14:27 +0300 > Cc: emacs-devel > > > Or use C-x t; that's free. > > I like it, 'C-x t' has nice mnemonics, and on a Qwerty keyboard > 't' is located near '6', so 'C-x t' is not harder to type than 'C-x 6', > but let's hear more opinions before changing 'C-x 6' to 'C-x t'. Agreed. How about changing to "C-x t" if no one brings up serious objections within a week?