From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scrolling commands and skipping redisplay, was: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:51:53 +0300 Message-ID: <837dyagkwm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200403174757.GA8266@ACM> <83imibqsmm.fsf@gnu.org> <478c2aab-a5fc-61c2-02e2-2d9846b95273@yandex.ru> <83v9m9nltx.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv1rn8fx.fsf@gnu.org> <4f8bb277-b376-97bf-8539-799688d8e66d@yandex.ru> <83eesvmj15.fsf@gnu.org> <6eec7f68-770e-b3b1-4627-6222f3ef7216@yandex.ru> <83ftd9kwlu.fsf@gnu.org> <1de9d24f-eeb7-7d0a-3768-4baba4365066@yandex.ru> <83zhbcdmyi.fsf@gnu.org> <61f565cd-4fee-d48c-a9ef-b78419b3d058@yandex.ru> <83wo6ed4kb.fsf@gnu.org> <464b5639-7790-fdbc-b519-22a6b0e8c016@yandex.ru> <83o8rqaucp.fsf@gnu.org> <551c7634-f614-c5a7-c089-33a0dc56574d@yandex.ru> <83imhyaqyw.fsf@gnu.org> <3ddcec07-079f-18e8-81a7-76eaf9a8187a@yandex.ru> <83d083ia16.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2qqgrr6.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="126522"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rudalics@gmx.at, rrandresf@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 20 18:52:50 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZf7-000Wnk-Tz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:52:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZf7-0008Or-05 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53866 helo=eggs1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZeT-0007xt-5d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51109) by eggs1p.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZeR-0003b5-DM; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3326 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jQZeI-0003I9-E6; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:51:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:27 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:247401 Archived-At: > Cc: acm@muc.de, rrandresf@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, > rudalics@gmx.at > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:42:27 +0300 > > On 20.04.2020 17:23, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > So "C-2 C-n" would behave differently from "C-n C-n", or from running > > a macro that records 2 C-n in a row? Is that a good thing? > > Is scroll-conservatively is 1, 'C-2 C-n' should behave differently at > the bottom of the window from 'C-n C-n'. Why? they both move point by 2 lines. > If a macro recording doesn't behave the same as the original > invocations, I'd call it a bug as well. Though probably of a lesser > priority. We'll have to disagree, I guess. I personally don't care much about scroll-conservatively, although I did spend some hours making it behave like others requested.