From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: transient Date: Sun, 03 May 2020 21:58:07 +0300 Message-ID: <837dxsq20w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87368npxw4.fsf@bernoul.li> <87v9ljo5d0.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ftcnxu5m.fsf@bernoul.li> <83y2qezlpd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv12zjx1.fsf@gnu.org> <20200429101755.GF24737@tuxteam.de> <838sicw4do.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhaqu89z.fsf@gnu.org> <83sggiu2p9.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1w2s9wi.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9leqmss.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhapoz63.fsf@gnu.org> <0a13f7e1-61c7-1e78-22bc-a27c15c269e7@yandex.ru> <83h7wxotix.fsf@gnu.org> <18096f9a-c617-f37b-cdaa-1a6198db2e1c@yandex.ru> <83a72porka.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="70536"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 20:58:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jVJpF-000IFw-Ii for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 20:58:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42320 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVJpE-0000Ka-LA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 14:58:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVJon-0008MK-H9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 14:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jVJom-0005Da-P2; Sun, 03 May 2020 14:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1565 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jVJob-0006yR-C0; Sun, 03 May 2020 14:58:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 3 May 2020 20:42:52 +0300) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248733 Archived-At: > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, tomas@tuxteam.de, rms@gnu.org, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 20:42:52 +0300 > > Regardless of whether I regularly use the manual or not, it's not okay > to dismiss subpar code completion experience just because we have > separate commands that also do a more free-form search. Once again: I don't dismiss it, I'm trying to show that it's sub-optimal for some jobs, in particular for discovery.