From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [feature/dll-only-windows] A new windows build, comments wanted Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: <837dokhh98.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pn2dq3xv.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83ft39hnk1.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeit23ob.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30569"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 17:47:47 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kydsZ-0007rH-2o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 17:47:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38694 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kydsY-0006Xc-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:47:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kydrD-0005ei-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:46:23 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kydrC-0007k1-WA; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:46:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1986 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kydr7-0003Kw-FL; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 11:46:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87eeit23ob.fsf@telefonica.net> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes on Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:36:36 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262856 Archived-At: > From: Óscar Fuentes > Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 22:36:36 +0100 > > > I cannot tell you what to do, but it would be nice to have binaries > > that can be run on older Windows versions. So if the build supports > > XP and older Windows, keeping the 32-bit build would be an advantage. > > MSYS2 MinGW-w64 binaries do not support XP, they officially decided this > some years ago and now some runtime dlls use APIs not present on XP. That's what I knew. So in that case, I see no reason for us to produce official 32-bit binaries, as the chances for them being used are likely nil.