From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Lift {global,local}-key-binding to Lisp
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 09:45:57 +0200
Message-ID: <837doebq2y.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83zh1cbpua.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkm=M0dWgD2g4JXL4rOj1=-MTUF9aPV1=5cCF5OgDAACzGg@mail.gmail.com>
 <xjfeein2pv9.fsf@sdf.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="14887"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 15 08:46:44 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l0Joh-0003lm-KF
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:46:43 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l0Jog-0000VC-N2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 02:46:42 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55842)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1l0Jo0-0008W2-1n
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 02:46:00 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40683)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l0Jnz-0001ig-BX; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 02:45:59 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3697
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l0Jny-0000yT-QK; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 02:45:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <xjfeein2pv9.fsf@sdf.org> (message from Andrea Corallo on Thu, 14
 Jan 2021 21:03:06 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263070
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/263070>

> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 21:03:06 +0000
> 
> +1
> 
> IMO if the rework is an improvement (I think it is) should go in.

How is it an improvement?  It doesn't even qualify as refactoring,
because the code was rewritten almost verbatim in Lisp.

> Yes someone will have to re-learn where those functions are but
> that's what cooperative work looks like.

Cooperation is a two-way street, you know.  The above seems to assume
it's a one-way street: I'm being asked to cooperate, but others don't
have to feel obliged.  Doesn't strike me as fair deal.