From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: master 927b885 1/3: Disable filtering of
 commands in M-x completion
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:37:45 +0200
Message-ID: <837dn44fmu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20210217165944.26910.26583@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <20210217165946.030D420DFC@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmmOw5FKWuq+j=bPtg6-fYD3zqSSCGuxajq4Kvt0e=8pQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87blcih3ar.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
 <SA2PR10MB4474594B3C7157F60795E284F3869@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <87sg5toh2y.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
 <SA2PR10MB4474BCAA9FCF73649B64B76AF3859@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <87a6s1e3a3.fsf@mail.linkov.net>
 <SA2PR10MB447471D8772D96D87E45FEB2F3859@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <83zh01419g.fsf@gnu.org>
 <SA2PR10MB44742CA5866728F0C53F5C36F3859@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 <83sg5t408m.fsf@gnu.org> <5079ff93-1844-6e26-1219-75513abf3c3b@gmx.at> 
 <SA2PR10MB44740DFBE043DB46AC2912F1F3859@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="10808"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, juri@linkov.net, stefankangas@gmail.com,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 09:38:30 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lD1J0-0002je-Hk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:38:30 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33616 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lD1Iz-0000GG-Jp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:38:29 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58742)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lD1I8-0008GW-46
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:37:36 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58776)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lD1I5-0002c1-6E; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:37:34 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3517
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lD1I1-0007uC-M9; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 03:37:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <SA2PR10MB44740DFBE043DB46AC2912F1F3859@SA2PR10MB4474.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
 (message from Drew Adams on Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:32:54 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265212
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/265212>

> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> CC: "emacs-devel@gnu.org" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>,
>         "stefankangas@gmail.com"
> 	<stefankangas@gmail.com>,
>         "juri@linkov.net" <juri@linkov.net>
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 23:32:54 +0000
> 
> And the doc of `mark-even-if-inactive' says
> nothing about the mark existing - it's only about
> whether the mark (assuming it exists) is active.

Precisely.  So what exactly is the problem with the docs?  Are you
saying you don't know what "active mark" or "active region" means?
I'd be surprised.