From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:54:06 +0300 Message-ID: <837ddxtimp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilxi7531.fsf@gnus.org> <875yth7bjr.fsf@gnus.org> <871r4576ey.fsf@gnus.org> <87wnlx5rd4.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28379"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 28 14:55:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mg4wj-00079l-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 14:55:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34832 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg4wh-0003Cz-Ip for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg4uz-0002P0-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg4uz-0006PB-KJ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:54:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=zfUYef/h8AMQEuWjK9XbWlwWHagSza8rDtuDzqpvMPs=; b=VE4sBeBJ/ak8 s8SISBKz4G52bCqt91B4QHmcoiAVkEZEP1xkvjjgYXKj0s3qNLQ7dgSisS4n85nDdN9nQMmlIv/vG 1BwbQw9eKcpCM9/JLuekkw3PViFNxMRK1+0JZ+OstuWQMhMKwQrhgIfJ2HBc8TREIxQkG8Y08rKY6 Cz9glwuEPtrPPCHvGcm3AVWGW+bbO8+UYHZJJChFYQCaRlk+WYZ1SZ49Cy21uOckDpICoVMP48qWw pke/mnvaKWCprIXbE/eNUdKDNxqdVbeNeTJkHsl/bfGgPjvYR4CBQ59eUr80KC0NL4ZVItD93Lgae QqFDlzrvlJMsBCLQhknF6Q==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3677 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mg4uz-0002Gu-1d; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 08:54:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wnlx5rd4.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:19:19 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278095 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 13:19:19 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Well, that didn't really make `C-x 8 e e' (the first time) a whole lot > faster. I mean, it's twice as fast, but I thought it was going to make > it instantaneous, and it's not. And it's because I'm going over all the > emojis doing `char-displayable-p' on them all to weed out the ones we > don't have a font for, and that's apparently very slow? (I mean, it > takes 0.2s to do them all, so it's not... beyond the pale, but it's > still annoying.) Why do you need to call char-displayable-p in this case?