From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 13:58:46 +0300 Message-ID: <837d2rxqmx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tu5wy7jb.fsf@gnu.org> <87a67oxhfb.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30845"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 29 13:01:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oScVr-0007on-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 13:01:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oScVq-0000EH-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 07:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oScTN-0007oQ-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:58:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oScTM-0004nB-JI; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:58:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=sxSYPT8/EV8HqBDTHedNSxFyUmDex7oo+haPotMj8M8=; b=JYAWGGNQxfrZ g4tA7b4spMeYj9VgC6LqEFtqFSAXIEIXwrr5UNvrI7Q6jtklIIkQZl7CKocEyWWk7Zb2rXpm4vN9y ubER11wQcw2Ml0rF0ZCzxsxtR7ykNoUGWGVR1p5L1inSYmoymdz+gmyDw6ZUKUmQan+jGjVpPsPTq XYuyWGgYmN/c1ONHS0fHvFHMFQPGjmgup0jQIX33EH5JiP9lnxZ259uUIk9eIuuZk2FgArjIA6jhn nbQGuTWVXUqCj8aAaHTJtJRG11ivyOpqgwGEnVlZ5qHDUfAT5RUc5p0Y4aC7RbM2Qww60pDWOe7QJ LfFkkL41kToNXaq4Bw+Jxg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3642 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oScTK-0007BG-GB; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 06:58:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87a67oxhfb.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:05:28 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294278 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2022 22:05:28 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > No text terminal can support all the key combinations a GUI > > display can. > > Why ever not? Because not every combination can be expressed as a character code. > > The Linux console is abysmally inadequate for Emacs, from > > where I stand. > > In terms of text, what's missing? Gobs of characters without glyphs.