From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Renaming eglot -- or at least add an alias? Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 18:39:04 +0300 Message-ID: <837d1jblk7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmfdduix.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfk7c1kh.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfk7woc1.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4934"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 17:40:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oeebq-0001AI-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 17:40:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50050 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeebp-00082T-Lq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 11:40:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeeaE-0007Gy-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 11:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeeaE-0008DJ-JP; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 11:39:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=i8+MkPS0M8vm+lXrBYie1t9nR65+GMpbayaCbFUPSj4=; b=SD9VtQUe9F2J AdnnLMwZSSWChw9iSHKfwtWOge7VW79tCO52cdWfsa+zIsQHuJtnUIK6m2mU4rs8r8ODQfXa+l10h DdM78bw1E+g/UsCiEVxaiRgR9EPjNNGzNOoltAIcDEoOTTrpUVWx3y6E91eWjZLcUX4qP+p6rq7OO whVcnNdr8sRO7VigGqwM0gTsCfqy3dw/PCTDr+LWsCxC24Hmgj2cqalp8bV2c1Ytb7bs9NRjz81AT HfIHV+5OUIHYMCwO3k+kKSnkaX7up2XTeXpX1L/GUTc+nn/PFmcw3av3setM6vwwxOOvplj5MSPFd PXNq0IJF4sySTZcEHsW28g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2838 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oeeaD-00008w-H0; Sat, 01 Oct 2022 11:39:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87sfk7woc1.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Sat, 01 Oct 2022 15:33:34 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296551 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 15:33:34 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> From: Richard Stallman > >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2022 05:28:53 -0400 > >> > >> > Sorry, no. We will not start a dispute about renaming eglot, because > >> > that would delay its merge, and we don't have time for that luxury. > >> > We want eglot to be part of Emacs 29. > >> > >> We can make this decision in a week. > > > > That's not possible, not with these decisions. > > > > And even a week's delay is too much. > > I don't know what decisions have been made, but is there a reason why > delays aren't possible? Is there some deadline? The deadline is that we want to have Eglot in Emacs 29, and the release branch is expected in late November.