From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: make check produces 25 failures and hangs (bug #65176).
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 16:44:04 +0300
Message-ID: <837cpxbuxn.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <ZNU3_iwBVnJA0qvc@ACM>
 <CAO2hHWYHQw41VkzZDSeKWPusppZ4XW1fLnF760qP2p=4HewQkQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZNVFMIadTs0tUhBq@ACM> <ZNVJ1ZTaOntwr2CZ@ACM>
 <9e9bf73a-f7e8-24e2-bd3f-5f4e86baa65e@vodafonemail.de>
 <83zg2ygmwu.fsf@gnu.org> <yp18ragcf3v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <yp14jl4cc27.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <7f5635a2-c2bc-b90b-35b9-7c6a07822dae@vodafonemail.de>
 <838rafcfhc.fsf@gnu.org> <yp1wmxyawok.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <83h6p1bzev.fsf@gnu.org> <yp1il9hbv6z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="31559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, acm@muc.de, yandros@gmail.com,
 emacs-devel@gnu.org, luangruo@yahoo.com
To: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 14 15:44:25 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1qVXrt-0007wY-7A
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 15:44:25 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1qVXrZ-0001BM-9Y; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:44:05 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1qVXrX-0001BD-Ir
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:44:03 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1qVXrX-0003pu-8X; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:44:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=cNt9W0svd1OtAbh5N8YX0fELX9Y5sph10u/rAfq/Jic=; b=WGLmGh8C04Wa
 F/ZLiYxgX2qSuo4CJ0Xcpgg+aFjzihfzQbnmQ/JG27sHO4DSl2llEflSSMRKth7LeYSrRD9GG3nAQ
 FjxvLjht3hQqw6wzvE6a0eywYJTQmr9ZhhHViXuZ5bjOwC7eGFXMplZw0EJtiRrswTbXohHkNsQmz
 TzsGC4Zo/oTHjWRGp4mqmABGUfBN9ats+G/4utgZXwmlTHXSfIrxispuH4KsV8MTcNlT/Xi1OD6dF
 z6uDPdMnbPN2i2M/GlmDIQ3vPf2McFOpty6j1+sAKdxsr9Awwa5T4MKvUDpeUFylDMEPdyl8W/5Du
 uHmysliTXNUMIyRKuiwzyw==;
In-Reply-To: <yp1il9hbv6z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Andrea Corallo
 on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:38:28 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308733
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/308733>

> From: Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org>
> Cc: jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de,  acm@muc.de,  yandros@gmail.com,
>   emacs-devel@gnu.org,  luangruo@yahoo.com
> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:38:28 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Where is the alias?  I don't think I see it.  What did I miss?
> 
> You are right apologies, got confised with the make-obsolete-variable we
> have in place.  I added the alias with 922b6490286 in 29.

Thanks.

> Should we do the same for `native-comp-deferred-compilation'?

Yes, please.