From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:30:00 +0200 Message-ID: <83637lg7wn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87637of4y8.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87oclfdzs2.fsf@kobe.laptop> <87hbr6jwsy.fsf@telefonica.net> <83my0yfc9g.fsf@gnu.org> <873a2pooqf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262359707 7106 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 15:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 16:28:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQjQJ-0005qd-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 16:28:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQjQJ-0002pb-FL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:28:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQjQE-0002oj-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQjQ8-0002kV-Vj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:28:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42602 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQjQ8-0002kO-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:56241) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQjQ8-0006Oq-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVK00D00QSIF200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:27:34 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVK008Y2QXXYQG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 17:27:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <873a2pooqf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119208 Archived-At: > From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" > Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:59:20 +0900 > > So I suspect you'd get resistence to such a suggestion, both on > principle ("The log message is part of history") and practically > ("there's no real benefit, it would take work to do, and it slightly > weakens our internal consistency guarantee"). Forget it. It's easier to set up flyspell for the log buffers.