From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDB on Mac is Broken Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:51:36 +0200 Message-ID: <8363503bhz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <19354.32067.21297.436863@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268466705 31532 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2010 07:51:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 07:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 08:51:41 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqM8K-00025p-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:51:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60898 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqM8K-0003Jj-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NqM8E-0003ID-GO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38845 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NqM8D-0003HV-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqM8B-0001LC-In for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:52491) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NqM8B-0001L7-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:51:31 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZ700L00N160900@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:51:29 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.214.230]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZ700IQEN5TAVC0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:51:29 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121891 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:58:11 +0900 > From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu > > The related difference between Emacs 22, on which the completion > works, and Emacs 23 seems to be: > > 1. The default value of default-process-coding-system. > 2. A change in comint-exec-1. > > For the first one, the value is (mule-utf-8 . mule-utf-8) in Emacs 22, > and (utf-8-unix . utf-8-unix) in Emacs 23 on Mac OS X 10.6. And what is wrong with the Emacs 23 default, exactly? Doesn't OS X use LF as the end-of-line character, when communicating with subprocesses in general and with GDB in particular? > At least, the above differences explain why completion in *gdb* > buffer behaves differently between Emacs 22 and 23. Could you please explain how these two differences explain the bug? I'm afraid I don't see the immediate connection.