From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: arrow keys vs. C-f/b/n/p Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:19 +0300 Message-ID: <83631mkdpo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d3w2ncqs.fsf_-_@lola.goethe.zz> <87iq5py7xk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hm5ica5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zkz1gxgw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276452521 13615 80.91.229.12 (13 Jun 2010 18:08:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 20:08:40 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrbr-000149-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:08:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59004 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrbq-0008To-TD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54536 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONrbd-0008SZ-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrbb-0000kS-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:44682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONrbb-0000kK-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L3Y00600T0XVO00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.88.125]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L3Y006JDT1TUD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:08:18 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87zkz1gxgw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125879 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , David Kastrup , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 15:50:39 -0400 > > Also, I would like to know what existing bidi editors do for > Ctrl-left/right. In gedit, left and right arrows work like they do now in Emacs, i.e. they are sensitive to the paragraph direction. However, C-left and C-right are not sensitive to the paragraph direction. IOW, in a R2L paragraph, moves to the left, but C- moves by words _to_the_right_! So much for consistency (in Pango, I guess).