From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inlinable functions instead of macros Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:03:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83628fewup.fsf@gnu.org> References: <503001D6.6010305@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345323816 3299 80.91.229.3 (18 Aug 2012 21:03:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 21:03:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 18 23:03:35 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T2qBD-0001ns-Fq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 23:03:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36119 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2qBC-0001ux-8m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:03:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2qB9-0001ui-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:03:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2qB8-0002oI-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:49741) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T2qB8-0002o0-KM; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 17:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M8Y00J00YG4OQ00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:03:29 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M8Y00J54YHSEI50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 19 Aug 2012 00:03:29 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <503001D6.6010305@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152647 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:57:58 -0700 > From: Paul Eggert > Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 08/18/2012 12:08 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > > Could a GCC improvement be a good fix for this? For instance, if it > > allowed the assertion failure to find and mention the source location > > of the function's caller? > > That could be done via GCC. What do __FUNCTION__ and __func__ hold for an inlined function?