From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Anyone building Emacs trunk with MinGW w64 (32 bits) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:49:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83620i3t21.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjxumbjf.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83a9pu3zq1.fsf@gnu.org> <87vc8im7zi.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364060964 25813 80.91.229.3 (23 Mar 2013 17:49:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 23 18:49:51 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJSZi-0005xA-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 18:49:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48543 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJSZL-0001bG-6L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39345) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJSZI-0001b9-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJSZH-00024J-DA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:49:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52409) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJSZH-000242-5N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MK400K00K0YBG00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:49:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MK400JCAK69ZPC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 19:49:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87vc8im7zi.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158087 Archived-At: > From: =D3scar Fuentes > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 16:49:37 +0100 >=20 > Indeed, the problem consists on differences in the header files. Se= ems > that MinGW64 is diverging from MinGW at a quick pace. Adapting Emac= s to > those changes is a recipe for getting even more tangled preprocesso= r > code in Emacs. I'm not sure it is worth the trouble unless MinGW st= alls. You are probably right. We will hit these problems one day anyway, when we'd add support for 64-bit MinGW builds, which is only availabl= e in MinGW64, at least for now.