From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: call for more ert tests Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:40:13 +0300 Message-ID: <8361x3jqsy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838v1zjrnl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372099232 20397 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2013 18:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sebastian Wiesner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 20:40:32 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBgl-0004tJ-2y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:40:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54237 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBgk-00041g-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:40:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50867) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBgh-0003zJ-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBgg-0008WO-DK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBgg-0008VO-5n; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOW00600U217300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:40:24 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOW005FEUJCRMC0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:40:24 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160972 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:33:41 +0200 > From: Sebastian Wiesner > Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > IMO, unless we require every new feature to come with a test and a > > report that no regressions were found by running the existing tests, > > we will never get any better testability than what we have now. > > Then this is probably a good policy, isn't it? Which policy?