From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: More metaproblem
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:02:21 +0200
Message-ID: <8361dp3dky.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20141203211447.GB15111@thyrsus.com>
	<871toge5zw.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> <83388v6hsq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87egsftgd5.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> <83egsf3yci.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87iohq6nvn.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com> <83mw722eit.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87egse56hb.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com>
	<f5vblqaql6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87oarhzt87.fsf@ktab.red-bean.com>
	<20141205222416.GH7784@thyrsus.com> <87mw71oh2t.fsf@lifelogs.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417820558 4878 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2014 23:02:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 23:02:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 06 00:02:31 2014
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Xx1tP-0000EV-5Z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 00:02:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52806 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1Xx1tO-0000AL-Pk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:02:30 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43830)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Xx1t4-0000A6-TP
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:02:17 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1Xx1sy-0001dv-Jh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:02:10 -0500
Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:55816)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1Xx1sy-0001di-Br
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Dec 2014 18:02:04 -0500
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0NG400M00RF6E700@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org;
	Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:00:55 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0NG4000SST9JVA10@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org;
	Sat, 06 Dec 2014 01:00:55 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <87mw71oh2t.fsf@lifelogs.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179061
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/179061>

> From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 17:41:14 -0500
> 
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:24:16 -0500 "Eric S. Raymond" <esr@thyrsus.com> wrote: 
> 
> ESR> And yet, we wonder why there are 500+ regulars on #emacs  who don't dare
> ESR> set foot in here.  Well, why should they?  It's a hostile work environment.
> 
> The environment here was actually pretty friendly and professional until recently.

Indeed, and I wonder what exactly caused the change...