From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bug #23794; sort-line behavior regressed from prior Emacs versions Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 05:39:41 +0300 Message-ID: <8360t5aolu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83shwa9zmr.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh229ywc.fsf@gnu.org> <83inx69xcx.fsf@gnu.org> <0984ce22-cbcf-42a6-906e-a03b65f3c71c@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466303971 24273 80.91.229.3 (19 Jun 2016 02:39:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 02:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rswgnu@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 19 04:39:26 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdw-0004wi-OY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 04:39:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37200 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdv-0006jT-L4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:39:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdO-0006jC-C3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdI-0000bC-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:38:49 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdI-0000b8-LA; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:38:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2235 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bESdA-0006qB-FF; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 22:38:36 -0400 In-reply-to: <0984ce22-cbcf-42a6-906e-a03b65f3c71c@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204495 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel > > Is it not possible to have sort-lines _optionally_ ignore > (or not ignore) invisible whatevers? > > Are you discussing picking one or the other behavior only as > the default behavior, or are you discussing picking it as the > only behavior? The proposal was to make it the only behavior. I'm quite sure such backward incompatible changes are out of the question.