From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:12:09 +0300 Message-ID: <8360ogwdxy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <9D64B8EA-DB52-413D-AE6A-264416C391F3@iotcl.com> <83int1g0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <83twckekqq.fsf@gnu.org> <83funkwfzf.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477415554 14610 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2016 17:12:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 19:12:30 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5H2-00033D-8s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 19:12:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56595 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5H4-0003RP-KE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Gv-0003RI-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:12:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Gs-0003cM-97 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:12:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Gs-0003cG-5P; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1417 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bz5Gq-0003w0-E1; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:12:17 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Philipp Stephani on Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:48:47 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208789 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:48:47 +0000 > > I'm open to this. I'd *like* to see exploration of alternative paradigms for > expressing concurrency, so merging in the concurrency branch shouldn't be seen > as closing the door, or setting anything in stone. > > That might be the intention, but I expect the outcome will be that interest in alternative paradigms gets lost > (unless such alternative paradigms would also be merged and be available in parallel). Volunteers to come up with such alternatives are always welcome, of course.