unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 671dc5a: Fix calls to buffer modification hooks from replace-buffer-contents
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 21:54:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <836018xvux.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv1sbwpgzy.fsf-monnier+gmane.emacs.devel@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:44:54 -0400)

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:44:54 -0400
> 
> >> I don't understand enough of the code to have an opinion on it, but the
> >> comments describe a behavior which would be wrong: both before-c-f and
> >> after-c-f- need to be run for any buffer change, even if it's only an
> >> insertion or only a deletion.
> > What if there's no change at all, i.e. no deletions and no insertions?
> 
> Then you can either run neither of the hooks, or both.

How can we determine whether to run neither or not?

I can easily run both, but is that TRT?  It was you who requested not
to run the hooks on a range that is larger than we can determine by
looking at the results of compareseq.

> > You did read the bug report, didn't you?  Because unless I completely
> > misunderstand what you are saying, you are not describing the bug's
> > recipe.
> 
> Yes, I did.  All I read in the report seems fine, and your commit
> message sounds right as well.  But the comments seem to describe an
> incorrect behavior.

The recipe describes a case where "foo" is replaced by "foo", and the
code in compareseq tells us not to change anything.  There are no
deletions and no insertions.  Do we call the modification hooks in
this case?



  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-21 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180721180616.6608.26581@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <20180721180618.5CEA9208D4@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2018-07-21 18:16   ` [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 671dc5a: Fix calls to buffer modification hooks from replace-buffer-contents Stefan Monnier
2018-07-21 18:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-07-21 18:29       ` Stefan Monnier
2018-07-21 18:35         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-07-21 18:44           ` Stefan Monnier
2018-07-21 18:54             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2018-07-21 20:46               ` Stefan Monnier
2018-07-22  2:15                 ` Richard Stallman
2018-07-22  2:43                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-07-22  5:18                   ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=836018xvux.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).