From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: ELPA policy
Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 18:13:27 +0300
Message-ID: <835zd6ihns.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default>
 <CAGK7Mr6yb1wuy1X+vuuLnpdr=M3BoQDfhaOqgOvGMN-9D3hYWg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALDnm51HCa9aD78Gk0kSaSkmqD5jnef6rN6zM0PNYTtLJ6qFgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGK7Mr4wUfET+Sww1fMLCAOQKZzQGYG1wFu1YB_jx=5pshBHWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALDnm51n_MV07xxYmrUMZOQ=N9ksY35pWvNEG5xwuo0YwjLz5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGK7Mr4=HYOJf3-k0-mO0WM_WVyJnfGwmEqdF9R_2WdJyXd=Ug@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADwFkmnOU8mm2kXEnOj_dZsdESTuRD6icZ3GoFh99-p0qm-nBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1jWBwF-0006XV-Vz@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <jwv7dxpur3p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAGK7Mr6ujKD7oUZpApJ1W685NQzL2dkJYA9bJNbhGL-of_xAUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <E1jWWWi-0002ar-C1@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <jwvwo5o5teg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CAGK7Mr6AHERG2ytuzpqzKx12pOuYp5BbsVMPuu2eGHZXO7BHRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <jwvsggb50fv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1jWt3F-0004ka-MZ@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <jwva72jxflk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83zhaij4qn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwv5zd6wk3m.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="113351"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 08 17:18:25 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jX4lc-000TNx-5z
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 17:18:24 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35482 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jX4lb-00065f-5i
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:18:23 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60590)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jX4h3-0007QT-CI
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:13:41 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59218)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jX4h2-0005my-Vd; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:13:41 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4472 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jX4h1-00013A-Ts; Fri, 08 May 2020 11:13:40 -0400
In-Reply-To: <jwv5zd6wk3m.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Fri, 08 May 2020 10:57:58 -0400)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249288
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/249288>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 10:57:58 -0400
> 
> > FWIW, I took a cursory look at dash.el in ELPA, and was surprised to
> > see that its doc strings are not according to our coding conventions,
> > and functions/macros that clearly aren't internal don't follow the
> > naming conventions.
> 
> Then I suggest you file a bug report with the author.

Aren't ELPA bugs reported via our bug tracker?

> > So maybe it's time we defined the minimum requirements for packages to
> > be included in ELPA?
> 
> What good would it do?

<Shrug> It will get us on the same page when we are reviewing packages
and patches for ELPA.