From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused by y-or-n-p Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 19:14:03 +0200 Message-ID: <835z4fdzxg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834kkcr1eo.fsf@gnu.org> <43b24209-fa65-0e26-7cbd-f99175a7ffd8@gmx.at> <87wnx7j5is.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83im8qnyca.fsf@gnu.org> <83bleinmse.fsf@gnu.org> <56435592-d2d0-5fb6-977f-01e1931da835@gmx.at> <87k0t38g1z.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czyvkts6.fsf@gnu.org> <87bleetirr.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87y2hhri3n.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83pn2tkfg8.fsf@gnu.org> <871rf7ippu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83a6trg6mc.fsf@gnu.org> <87im8f951f.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1932"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 18:16:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkVm-0000LT-2G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:16:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57870 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkVl-0004pe-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkTy-00044r-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:14:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56938) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkTw-0001SR-C3; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:14:24 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1251 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkTp-0004nK-A1; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:14:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:06:55 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:262330 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2021 09:06:55 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, juri@linkov.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I think reversing the default would be less than optimal for two > > reasons: 1) The new behaviour is in Emacs 27, and flopping back to the > > Emacs 26 behaviour just sounds confusing > > See - that's the problem with saying that Emacs > can just go ahead and change stuff, because we > can always backtrack later. No one has said that, you are bringing up a strawman.