From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Mouse-hovering over 'mouse-face' overlays/regions on a TTY Emacs
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 15:06:14 +0200
Message-ID: <835z3x9gl5.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m25z5n6e6y.fsf@gmail.com> <838sajle0s.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2wny345mo.fsf@gmail.com> <83v9dmker4.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2eeka4xry.fsf@gmail.com> <83h7p6kd74.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2a6uy4t64.fsf@gmail.com> <837dq2k8ik.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87eekag0n3.fsf@gmail.com> <83zh2yisdt.fsf@gnu.org>
 <m2y2ii7jbh.fsf@gmail.com> <df5f98722954d2e5dd46f359c5baad4d@finder.org>
 <83o8jdgzgk.fsf@gnu.org> <5aff1d6ff795552203292395560a5075@finder.org>
 <83blf8cz9l.fsf@gnu.org> <91a58d2052f11b5f01a6ce41ebe93380@finder.org>
 <6d7d75bbad978a2eb8a80a7c90a33040@finder.org> <83a6t99v35.fsf@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="5657"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: jared@finder.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 16 14:08:22 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l0lJW-0001Oy-QU
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:08:22 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50788 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l0lJV-0005KJ-Qu
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:08:21 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52248)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1l0lHu-0004qz-4i
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:06:42 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52912)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l0lHt-0007si-MD; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:06:41 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1620
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l0lHR-0003ip-Mb; Sat, 16 Jan 2021 08:06:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <83a6t99v35.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 16
 Jan 2021 09:53:02 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263096
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/263096>

> Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 09:53:02 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:31:59 -0800
> > From: Jared Finder <jared@finder.org>
> > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > 
> > It seems like these set of patches got lost. Joao, Eli, is this no 
> > longer valuable?
> 
> It isn't lost, it is still in my queue.  Sorry for being such a slow
> patch-processing machine.

I installed that changeset now, with a small followup change: I see no
need in this case to have code that checks FRAME_MSDOS_P outside of
the #ifdef MSDOS conditional, as the former will never happen there,
and the number of #ifdef's would not be smaller anyway.

Thanks.