From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: woman.el broken? Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 16:40:17 +0200 Message-ID: <835z28l2r2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210301193951.7EB04C217D7@raman-glaptop.localdomain> <878s763bah.fsf@gnus.org> <83r1ky7icm.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgzm1vvf.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtvm7hkt.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfb469e7.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21215"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 03 15:41:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSge-0005Ns-Jt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 15:41:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSgd-0003RS-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:41:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38988) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSg0-0002gR-VN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:40:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSg0-0000LY-Dg; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:40:36 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3888 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lHSfy-0002cR-4p; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 09:40:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 3 Mar 2021 08:19:44 -0600) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:265881 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 08:19:44 -0600 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If this is performant enough, I don't at the moment see any reason to > > have it in C. Of course, the few places that call Flookup_key from C > > will need to be analyzed whether they need to call the internal > > function or the Lisp wrapper, and modified accordingly. > > OK. I will write up the patch and do some benchmarks. Thanks. > > This is not the only transformation we should apply, IMO: we should > > also convert "Foo Bar Baz" into "foo-bar-baz". See the Dired menus > > for examples. > > Yes, I will add that too. > > For "Foo Bar Baz", is it enough to look for "foo-bar-baz" or would we > need to look for both "Foo-Bar-Baz" as well? Based on what I see in our tree, only the former, but please double-check to make sure I didn't miss anything.