From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: is it possible to =?utf-8?B?wqtsb3Nlwrs=?= edits when aborting recursive-edits? Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 11:02:58 +0200 Message-ID: <835y00med9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ply86ham.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83bk9smkvp.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk9sic99.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="674"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Uwe Brauer Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 11 10:04:08 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNqyu-000ATB-3M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 10:04:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNqy8-0000fJ-3v; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:03:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNqy7-0000fB-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNqy6-0002ES-UA; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 04:03:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=0Jqo/WeV9fVFopdPd98mtfBQHJ+TyTsJvncVb1vh6I8=; b=o5X/jCDMX3wvcW3XOnTR bAqvEXB1YO7X4C6uoniSBtuf+90qgEe+D7IsuOgCAswy85dq3Bn7rYENK8vg1CB/WoYR4hM/t+U7W r5q9K4QKFpGAcPHMEikPKpccQPOFhE5bztjoF0XqS6Km6g3uHLrEDBH4dKXQD6z26DkAPNnQ4X2fv QVkTw2nNZ7chlD/4Xvf+1QjeX8dOP4y79DLFurJpm3IRY8yvjo6xydq6L0RDf9jyigwenMGh2upG4 6/5RpCxCfbgu99oPksZNzaOwOwKyHUvIn68W98FGKU2SRrjRBY33whYLRctWRox3VL4olAp//100B RzyASMBqi+Egww==; In-Reply-To: <87bk9sic99.fsf@mat.ucm.es> (message from Uwe Brauer on Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:02:10 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:314843 Archived-At: > From: Uwe Brauer > Cc: Uwe Brauer , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 08:02:10 +0100 > > >>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What do you mean by "not committed"? > > The did not appear in the commit. > > Here is an example > > Paragraph 1: > > New: blabla > > Paragraph: 2 > > New: more blabla blabla > > C-] > > Commit via vc-next-action > > All new parts paragraph 1 are not part of the commit. Sorry, this is still not detailed enough: how did those "new parts" appear, and in which buffer? IOW, what did you do to make these new parts appear wherever they appeared? > Possible explanation > > Paragraph 2 > > New more blabla > > Was written on the top-level but Paragraph 1 on some second or higher > recursive-level and disappeared after having hit C-] I'm asking for more details about the "was written" part. It will be the simplest if you describe the commands you invoked before C-], even if it's just typing some text. IOW, a complete recipe of the issue.