From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:06:09 +0200
Message-ID: <834ob78ixa.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <icf8d1$rlq$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<icghq1$tns$1@dough.gmane.org>
	<87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874ob7tzlr.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net>
	<AANLkTimzdB8pdSj8nqqXiFihkJbbyTSYzHtPsb+GR8HE@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290571470 31884 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2010 04:04:30 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 04:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, jasonr@gnu.org
To: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 24 05:04:25 2010
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1PL6an-00084k-BS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:04:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47295 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1PL6am-0001XL-UD
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:04:24 -0500
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51416 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL6ae-0001X9-IN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:04:21 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1PL6aX-0002BY-11
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:04:16 -0500
Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41957)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1PL6aW-0002BT-LW; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:04:08 -0500
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0LCD00F00F9XRC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:04:07 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.9.106]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0LCD00F4SFATEK60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 06:04:07 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimzdB8pdSj8nqqXiFihkJbbyTSYzHtPsb+GR8HE@mail.gmail.com>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133108
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/133108>

> From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:06:42 +0100
> Cc: Sean Sieger <sean.sieger@gmail.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> I offer the same question as I did before: Is there any advantage of
> shipping both binaries with debug info and without it? (In separate
> downloads, of course.)

You never made clear that you are talking about separate downloads,
until now.

Having separate downloads is fine, assuming that Sean (or whoever
prepares the zip archives) can handle the extra workload.